CJ1003: Task Assessment, you analyze case studies that feature issues related to mental health and crime

   

Overview

For this Performance Task Assessment, you analyze case studies that feature issues related to mental health and crime.

Professional Skills: Written Communication is assessed in this Competency.

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This  is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and  it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the  Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of  the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and  use their time most productively.

 

Mental Health Issues and Criminal Acts

For this assessment, you analyze case studies that feature issues  related to mental health and crime. Then, in 1,500–2,000 words, respond  to the following:

  • Explain how to distinguish between mental illness and criminality,  using examples from the case studies to illustrate the difference.
  • Explain how the criminal justice system has typically or  “traditionally” addressed an offender who has committed a crime due to a  mental health issue, using examples from the case studies to illustrate  the difference.
  • Explain how the contemporary criminal justice system addresses an  offender who commits a crime due to a mental health issue, using  examples from the case studies to illustrate your response. For example,  address the following issues:
    • How should the responding officer proceed?
    • How should this person be processed through the criminal justice system? 
    • What are the appropriate charges, if any?
    • How should the judge at the arraignment hearing proceed?
  • Explain whether you agree or disagree with the following statement:  The criminal justice system has an ethical obligation to rehabilitate or  treat offenders suffering from mental illness.
    • What is the role of the criminal justice system regarding these types of incidents?

In addition to using the case studies to help illustrate your  responses, reference your learning resources to support your responses.

Academic Writing Expectations Checklist

The faculty Assessor will use this checklist to evaluate whether your written responses adhere to the conventions of scholarly writing. Review this checklist prior to submitting your Assessment to ensure your writing follows academic writing expectations. Click the links to access Writing Center resources:

Sentence-Level Skills

|_| Constructing complete and correct sentences Note: See an explanation of sentence components and how to avoid sentence fragments and run-ons.

|_| Using and spelling words correctly Note: See a list of commonly misused words and information on MS Word’s spell check.

|_| Using punctuation appropriately Note: See the different types of punctuation and their uses.

|_| Using grammar appropriately Note: See a Grammarly tutorial to catch further errors.

Paragraph-Level Skills

|_| Using paragraph breaks Note: See a description of paragraph basics.

|_| Focusing each paragraph on one central idea (rather than multiple ideas) Note: See an explanation of how topic sentences work.

Use of Evidence

|_| Using resources appropriately Note: See examples of integrating evidence in a paper.

|_| Citing and referencing resources accurately Note: See examples of citing and referencing resources in a paper.

|_| Paraphrasing (explaining in one’s own words) to avoid plagiarizing the source Note: See paraphrasing strategies.

Formatting Written Assignments

|_| Using appropriate APA formatting, including title page, margins, and font Note: See APA overview and APA template from the Writing Center.

Comments:

©2014 Walden University 1

image1.wmf

image2.png

image3.png

image4.png

image5.png

,

©2019 Walden University 1

CJ1003: Mental Health and the Criminal Justice System: Differentiate between mental health issues and criminal behavior in criminal justice practice.

Assessment Rubric

Rubric Criteria 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

Types of Mental Illness and Crime in Context

Explain how to distinguish between mental illness and criminality, using examples from the case study to illustrate the difference. LO1: Compare characteristics of mental health illness and criminality

Response is not present. The response minimally or incompletely explains how to distinguish between mental health illness and criminality; references from the learning resources are not present or they are not accurately used to support the response. Examples from the case study are not present, or they are used inaccurately or not applicable.

The response explains how to distinguish between mental health illness and criminality, using references from the learning resources to support the response. The response also uses examples from the case study to show how you would apply these distinctions.

The Overlap of Mental Illness and Crime Explain how the criminal justice system has typically or “traditionally” addressed an offender who has committed a crime due to a mental health issue, using

Response is not present. The response minimally or incompletely explains how the criminal justice system has typically or “traditionally” addressed an offender who has committed a crime due to a mental health issue;

The response explains how the criminal justice system has typically or “traditionally” addressed an offender who has committed a crime due to a mental health issue, using references from the learning

©2019 Walden University 2

Rubric Criteria 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

examples from the case study to illustrate the difference. LO2: Analyze traditional means of addressing mental health illness and crime

references from the learning resources are not present or they are not accurately used to support the response. Examples from the case study are not present, or they are used inaccurately or not applicable.

resources to support the response. The response also uses examples from the case study to illustrate how “traditional” approaches could be applied.

The Overlap of Mental Illness and Crime Explain how the contemporary criminal justice system addresses an offender who commits a crime due to a mental health issue, using examples from the case study to illustrate the difference. LO3: Analyze contemporary means of addressing mental health illness and crime

Response is not present. The response minimally or incompletely explains how the criminal justice system has typically or “traditionally” addressed an offender who has committed a crime due to a mental health issue; references from the learning resources are not present or they are not accurately used to support the response. Examples from the case study are not present, or they are used inaccurately or not applicable.

The response explains how the criminal justice system has typically or “traditionally” addressed an offender who has committed a crime due to a mental health issue, using references from the learning resources to support the response. The response also uses examples from the case study to illustrate how contemporary approaches could be applied.

The Overlap of Mental Illness and Crime

Explain whether you agree or disagree with the

Response is not present. The response takes a position on the following statement,

The response takes a clearly stated position on the

©2019 Walden University 3

Rubric Criteria 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

following statement: The criminal justice system has an ethical obligation to rehabilitate or treat offenders suffering from mental illness. LO4: Analyze ethical considerations related to mental health illness and crime

although that position may be unclear: The criminal justice system has an ethical obligation to rehabilitate or treat offenders suffering from mental illness. References from the learning resources are not present or they are not accurately used to support the response.

following statement: The criminal justice system has an ethical obligation to rehabilitate or treat offenders suffering from mental illness. The response references the learning resources to support the position.

Mastery Rubric

In order to achieve mastery of this Competency, you must achieve a “2” on every rubric row in addition to meeting the additional

expectation indicated in the Mastery Rubric.

Mastery Rubric No Yes

Exceeds Expectations: Perspective Taking/Embracing Contradiction

Acknowledges alternate, divergent, or contradictory perspectives when distinguishing between mental health issues and criminal activity.

Responses do not acknowledge and integrate varied responses, perspectives, and approaches to what constitutes a mental health issue, criminal behavior, or both.

Responses acknowledges and integrates varied responses, perspectives, and approaches to what constitutes a mental health issue, criminal behavior, or both.

Professional Skills Assessment

©2019 Walden University 4

In this Competency Assessment, you will be assessed on the following Professional Skills: Written Communication. These skills count

toward your achievement of the Competency and the Professional Skills.

Written Communication: Write with clarity, coherence, and purpose

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

LO1: Develop clear introduction statements.

Introduction statement is not present.

Introduction statement is unclear and/or unfocused.

Introduction statement is well defined and clearly describes the topic and focus of the response.

LO2: Use transitions to connect ideas.

Transitions are not present. Transitions are used inconsistently or limit a reader’s access to ideas.

Writing conveys a cohesive idea through the effective use of transitions.

LO3: Use appropriate tone and vocabulary for a given audience.

Vocabulary and tone are inappropriate for the audience.

Vocabulary and tone vary throughout the writing, limiting a reader’s access to ideas.

Vocabulary and tone communicate key concepts that are appropriate for the audience.

LO4: Apply APA formatting and style guidelines.

APA formatting and style are not present.

Writing inconsistently uses in-text citations and references. Major errors in APA Style impede understanding and/or violate standards for academic integrity.

Writing uses in-text citations appropriately, includes references when applicable, and is formatted according to APA Style. Minor errors in APA Style do not impede understanding or violate standards for academic integrity.

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts