CRJ 322 SU Wk2 Criminal Mind Law Deviant Behavior Case Study Essay
Description
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on CRJ 322 SU Wk2 Criminal Mind Law Deviant Behavior Case Study Essay completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Case Study 1: Deviant Behaviors
Due Week 2 and worth 160 points
Use the Internet and/or the Strayer Library (https://research.strayer.edu) to research one criminal case within the last three years in which authorities found the defendant to be engaging in deviant behavior. As you research this case, investigate the manner in which social controls may have helped or hurt the defendant.
Write a 3- to 5-page paper in which you address the following thoroughly. Cite specifics from the case wherever possible to support your arguments:
- Determine whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in the consequences for the defendant. Provide a rationale to support your position.
- Debate whether you believe that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support the use of this behavior. Next, support or criticize whether the social norms of persons the defendants age are reasonable in a very politically correct society. Provide support for your response.
- Argue for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Next, specify whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the behavior of the defendant. Provide a rationale to support your response.
- Identify formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Justify your response.
- Use at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar types of websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references should follow the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the students name, the professors name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Classify risk factors associated with age of onset and future deviant and / criminal behavior.
- Differentiate between the main theoretical approaches used to address criminal personalities.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues related to the criminal mind.
- Write clearly and concisely about topics involving the criminal mind using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 160 |
Case Study 1: Deviant Behaviors |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Determine whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in consequences for the defendant. Provide a rationale to support your position. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in consequences for the defendant. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your position. |
Insufficiently determined whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in consequences for the defendant. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your position. |
Partially determined whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in consequences for the defendant. Partially provided a rationale to support your position. |
Satisfactorily determined whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in consequences for the defendant. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your position. |
Thoroughly determined whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in consequences for the defendant. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your position. |
|
2. Debate whether you believe that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support this behavior. Next, support or criticize whether the social norms of persons the defendants age are reasonable in a very politically correct society. Provide support for your response. |
Did not submit or incompletely debated whether you believed that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support this behavior. Did not submit or incompletely supported or criticized whether the social norms of persons the defendants age were reasonable in a very politically correct society. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your response. |
Insufficiently debated whether you believed that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support this behavior. Insufficiently supported or criticized whether the social norms of persons the defendants age were reasonable in a very politically correct society. Insufficiently provided support for your response. |
Partially debated whether you believed that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support this behavior. Partially supported or criticized whether the social norms of persons the defendants age were reasonable in a very politically correct society. Partially provided support for your response. |
Satisfactorily debated whether you believed that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support this behavior. Satisfactorily supported or criticized whether the social norms of persons the defendants age were reasonable in a very politically correct society. Satisfactorily provided support for your response. |
Thoroughly debated whether you believed that the social norms for persons of the defendants age support this behavior. Thoroughly supported or criticized whether the social norms of persons the defendants age were reasonable in a very politically correct society. Thoroughly provided support for your response. |
|
3. Argue for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Next, specify whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the defendants behavior. Provide a rationale to support your response. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely argued for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Did not submit or incompletely specified whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the defendants behavior. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response. |
Insufficiently argued for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Insufficiently specified whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the defendants behavior. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response. |
Partially argued for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Partially specified whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the defendants behavior. Partially provided a rationale to support your response. |
Satisfactorily argued for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Satisfactorily specified whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the defendants behavior. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response. |
Thoroughly argued for or against the theory that an informal sanction (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendants behavior. Thoroughly specified whether or not the informal sanctions would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the defendants behavior. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response. |
|
4. Identify formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Justify your response. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. |
Insufficiently identified formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Insufficiently justified your response. |
Partially identified formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Partially justified your response. |
Satisfactorily identified formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Satisfactorily justified your response. |
Thoroughly identified formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Thoroughly justified your response. |
|
5. Cite 3 references. Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present. |
7-8 errors present. |
5-6 errors present. |
3-4 errors present. |
0-2 errors present. |
