Frostburg State Donald Trumps victory in 2016 & Reaction to Identity Crisis HW

Description

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Frostburg State Donald Trumps victory in 2016 & Reaction to Identity Crisis HW  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Please write a reaction paper to either of these books but not both.This must be a minimum of five pages, double spaced, 12 point font Times New Roman MLA. Please use just the book you choose- no other outside sources. If you are a supporter of the Republican party, please do not accept this assignment. This needs to be in support of the Democratic party fully. Any other beliefs mentioned in the prompt will result in a refund being requested for the assignment.

You can find the link to the books for free below:

Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

OR

Sides, John, Michael Tesler, and Lynn Vavreck. 2018. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America.

Your assignment is to write a reaction paper to either of these books but not both. You can find the link to the books for free here:

Mason Book: http://gen.lib.rus.ec/search.php?req=Mason%2C+Lilliana.+2018.+Uncivil+Agreement%3A+How+Politics+Became+Our+Identity.+Chicago%3A+The+University+of+Chicago+Press&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def

Sides book: http://gen.lib.rus.ec/search.php?req=Sides%2C+John%2C+Michael+Tesler%2C+and+Lynn+Vavreck.+2018.+Identity+Crisis%3A+The+2016+Presidential+Campaign+and+the+Battle+for+the+Meaning+of+America.&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def

Write a review and reaction to the book. Answer the following questions in the paper:

a. What is the argument of the book? What evidence is used to support that argument? What evidence do I know that would either provide additional support for the argument, extend the argument to a different context or set of circumstances, or contradict the argument?

b. Does the argument of this book make sense in light of current events that I am watching unfold in real time? How so? How not so? If not, were the authors wrong all along or has politics changed since they developed their argument?

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts