George Mason University Bioethics Research on Stem Cells Presentation

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on George Mason University Bioethics Research on Stem Cells Presentation  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

The Assignment:

You are asked to choose an issue in “bioethics” (broadly construed) that you findinteresting and is not one of the topics we cover in the course. (Confirm your topic with me before starting to make sure it’s not a topic covered in the course)

Your topic or issue can be something that you read about in a newspaper or magazine, orit can be a case study that you come across and find interesting. You should indicate your source somewhere onyour presentation.

The length of your presentation is the same as for Project I (1-2 slides for each of the fourparts described below).

Part 1: Identify debatable proposition

• Briefly describe the case study, article, or other source in enough detail that anewcomer to the subject could be expected to grasp or have a clear appreciationof the debatable proposition that you are to identify in this part of yourpresentation. Of key importance is that you present each side as a plausibleposition (as an issue that we should expect to find reasonable people on both sidesof).

Part 2: Argument on the one side

• Give what you judge to be the most compelling reason in support of one side. Ifyour argument takes a consequentialist form, or uses Kantian language, youshould say that, but you are not required to base any of your reasons onconsequentialism or the like. You should give the reason (the argument insupport of the reason) that you find the intuitively most compelling even if itdoesn’t obviously fit one of these categories.

Part 3: Argument on the other side

• Now do the same for the other side of the issue.

Part 4: Declare a winner

• Say which side has the force of the better argument and explain why. The easiestway to justify your choice is by pointing to any flaws or weaknesses you find inthe losing argument, although you may justify your choice of the winningargument in another way if that seems more natural to you.