HC 366 Herzing University Week 6 Training Tools and Techniques in Healthcare PPT

ByFusion Essays

Description

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on HC 366 Herzing University Week 6 Training Tools and Techniques in Healthcare PPT  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Unit 6 Assignment – Training Tools and Techniques

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 65
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Estimated time to complete: 5 hours

To properly implement change, a manager needs to have a toolkit for staff to use in order to help with the transition. When staff is trained and provided with the tools required for success, the change can run more smoothly and chances of long-term success are greater.

Instructions: After reading the unit articles and watching the unit videos, complete the following:

  • Choose three of the strategies or tools discussed and create a training toolkit presentation for the staff to use during the implementation of the EMR. The toolkit should include:
  1. Three strategies for the staff to use during implementation. Each strategy should include: A summary, examples, and ideas for the staff to apply for individual roles during change implementation (recall the roles created in Unit 5 for each staff member in the scenario) and recommendations for use of the strategy, specific to the EMR implementation
  2. Steps outlined for staff as to how/when to apply strategies during implementation
  • Create a PowerPoint presentation of the information in this assessment. The presentation should be a minimum of 10 slides, not including the title slide and the reference slide. The presentation needs to utilize speaker’s notes or recorded notes on each slide and should have a minimum of 5 references, formatted in APA style.

Rubric

Unit 6 Assignment – Training Tools and Techniques

Unit 6 Assignment – Training Tools and Techniques
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 23.76 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 20.52 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 10.8 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 5.4 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
27.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 23.76 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 20.52 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 10.8 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 5.4 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
6.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 2.0 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 1.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 65.0

Next

Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts