John Paul the Great Catholic Freedom of Internal Market in the EU Discussion
Description
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on John Paul the Great Catholic Freedom of Internal Market in the EU Discussion completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
I WAS ASKED TO PREPARE THE LEGAL BASE IN THIS ARGUMENTS IN SAME WAY THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CAN PRESENT THE CASES AND INLINE WITH THE DIRECTIVES THAT ARE INVOLVED
Case1
Mrs. K citizen of Greece went to Germany and took a job there as a secretary in one of the schools. After a year of work has been released on disciplinary grounds. Then she went to Spain and then began working at the school as well as a secretary with similar results. This time, however, was initiated criminal proceedings against her, which was completed conviction in suspension. As a result of it she did not renew her right of residence in Spain. She appealed against that decision. During the proceedings, she married a Greek citizen who was not employed in Spain, but benefit from the status of the student.
Discuss the legal situation of Mrs. K in Spanish territory.
case 2
When he was a student, he had problems with illegal drug possession. Upon reaching the age of majority, he was accused of dealing in narcotics as part of an organised group. The criminal court sentenced him to three years’ imprisonment. After this time, he started a job. After four years, he married a third-country national. When his wife applied for the right of residence as a family member of a migrant citizen, she received a negative decision and Mr. X got an expulsion decision due to the protection of imperative grounds of public security. Discuss their the legal situation.
case 3
An Italian citizen came to France in 1990, there he exercised his right of residence as a migrant worker. After two years of stay, he married a Chinese citizen. In 1995 the marriage ended in divorce due to family abuse of an Italian citizen, who was also convicted by a criminal sentence for abusing his family. As a result of this incident, he received a decision on immediate expulsion from France. His wife, at the time of submitting the application for the extension of her right of residence,
received a negative decision, because she lost the status of a family member of a migrant citizen. Discuss the legal situation of both of them.
