Mississippi McLeod Health Hospital Enhance the Provision of Care Study Analysis

In the online class, participation is graded as a part of discussion. In addition to your own post (which is due by Thursday midnight of each week), you should respond to the posts of a peer each week. To be substantive, your reply should add more information to the discussion, bring a helpful resource to the discussion forum, or question the response on the merit of your own research. Posts should be at least 250 words and each reply should be at least 150 words. In order to receive full credit you’ll need to reference the content of the discussion to your field of study (ex: nursing). Think about how the concept would apply to your field, how you would encounter the concept in your field, and how you would interact/experience the concept in your field of study.

Instructions:

Describe a research study you would be interested in using that would require the use of ANOVA to find the results. In your discussion provide the following:

1. Give a brief description of the study

2. The research question(s)

3. Your predicted results

4. The results if a type I error occured

5. The results if a type II error occured

Please post your initial response by 23:59 CST Thursday the Week, and comment on the post of a classmate by 23:59 CST Sunday.

Submission Instructions:
Writing should be in APA format (Times New Roman size 12 font). Proofread for grammatical accuracy. Late posts will be deducted points. Late replies will not be counted. Forums will close at 23:59 CST Sunday of each week. Type your response into the forum, avoid uploading a Word document with your post.

Grading Rubric

---

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

	Advanced	Emerging	Unsatisfactory
Post: Addresses question	2	1	0
Integrates information from readings and/or experiences	1	.5	0
Conveys understanding of key idea	1	.5	0
Relates key idea to professional field of study	1	.5	0
Appropriate length and style	1	.5	0
Logical organizations, conventional, and citations	1	.5	0
Response post: Addresses/considers peer’s writing	1	.5	0
Reply connects, extends, or applies question to colleagues’ idea	1	.5	0
Appropriate length and style