NR361 Chamberlain College Week 4 Patient Care Technologies Project

ByFusion Essays

Description

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR361 Chamberlain College Week 4 Patient Care Technologies Project  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Course Project Milestone 2 Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as an educator. You are to prepare a patient scenario based on the required assigned topic. You will choose an already developed and reliable mHealth app to use in the education of your patient.

Based on your accepted Milestone 1 assignment, use the information to identify three teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. You will also determine three ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. You will include both the mHealth application and a scholarly journal reference in APA format.

Course Outcomes

The Course Project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO1)

CO5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO5)

Required Assigned Topic

Required Assigned Topic for the focus of your paper.

• Person with Asthma OR breathing issues. Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app you identified in Week 2.

Requirements and Guidelines

  • Download the required Milestone 2 Template. (Links to an external site.) Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361 Milestone 2.docx.
  • Briefly state the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment.
    • Include revisions, if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
  • Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes.
    • Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety, guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided.
  • Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.
    • Remember to cite when appropriate
  • You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.)
  • Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 2 and type directly on your saved Milestone 2 Template.
  • Complete all rubric areas for a superior Milestone 2.
  • Use instructor feedback from Milestone 1 to improve your statements regarding the patient scenario in Milestone 2.

Transcript

Reminder

Before preparing your assignment, please review this “Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)“ resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

Rubric

NR361 Milestone 2
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefine: Approved Patient Scenario from Milestone 1Brief statement of the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment, including revisions if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
30.0 pts

Defines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including excellent details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).

 26.0 pts

Defines (states) the brief patient scenario from Milestone 1 including good details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).

 24.0 pts

Defines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including fair details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).

 12.0 pts

Definition of brief patient scenario is poorly done and/or revisions did not adhere to feedback from instructor on Milestone 1

 0.0 pts

Does not define (state) the nursing issue.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeach:Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Remember to use bullet points.
75.0 pts

Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Excellent details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.

 66.0 pts

Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Good details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.

 60.0 pts

Identifies 2 or 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Fair data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and/or how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points or information is not clear.

 29.0 pts

Identifies 1-2 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Poor data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, OR how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.

 0.0 pts

Did not identify teaching measures to improve patient outcomes.

75.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate:Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Cite when appropriate. Remember to use bullet points.
75.0 pts

Describe in excellent detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.

 66.0 pts

Describes in good detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.

 60.0 pts

Describes in fair detail 2-3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. May not use bullet points or information is not clear.

 29.0 pts

Describes in poor detail 1-2 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.

 0.0 pts

Did not identify ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.

75.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and References:Include citations and references for the mHealth application in APA format and a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article related to the patient scenario published within the past 5 years.
30.0 pts

Excellent citations and references in APA format for both the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old

 26.0 pts

Good citations and references with minor errors in APA format for both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old

 24.0 pts

Citations and references with some errors in APA format for both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old

 12.0 pts

Citations and references with numerous errors in APA format for the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal.

 0.0 pts

Did not cite or reference in APA format.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritingcontains no spelling or grammatical errors. Reading level is appropriate for patient described.
15.0 pts

Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct; Reading level appropriate for patient.

 13.0 pts

Good mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column

 12.0 pts

Fair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

 6.0 pts

Poor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column

 0.0 pts

Very poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect Topic and correct Template Use
0.0 pts

0 points deducted

Correct topic and correct template used for the assignment

 0.0 pts

22.5 points deducted (10%)

Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 22.5 point deduction (10%).

0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0 pts

0 points deducted

Submitted on time

 0.0 pts

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted

1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late

0.0 pts

Total Points: 225.0

Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts