NURS BSN 422 American Sentinel Aurora Critical Evaluation of Research Study

Choose One:

Instructions:

Paper

• 4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.

Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation

• 8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.
• Follow Rules of 7.

Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation

• 8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.
• Follow Rules of 7.

Video Presentation

• 5 to 8-minute video presentation.
• Attach reference page or include in video.
• Professional appearance and background.
• Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.

Table

• Table with appropriate columns and headers.
• Include title and reference pages.

Graphs or other illustrations

• Graphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.

Poster

• Poster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.

Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements.

Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative ResearchStudyDescription: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of research and itsutilization in practice.Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2)Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate betweenethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integratereliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinicaljudgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the deliveryof care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team membersto collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complexhealth care environments.QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based PracticeBSN Essential III, IV, VII, IXArea GoldMasterySilverProficientBronzeAcceptableAcceptableMastery notDemonstratedEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articlethe componentsof theappropriateevaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluatescredibility ofresearch articlethe componentsof theappropriateevaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluatescredibility ofresearch articleusing most of thecomponents(Greater than3/4) of theevaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluatescredibility ofresearch articleusing one-half ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Does not addresssection orincludes less thanone-half of theevaluation Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing most of thecomponents ofthe evaluation(greater than ¾)checklists inHouser (2018)Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing one-half ofthe evaluationchecklists inHouser (2018).Does not addresssection orincludes less thanone-half of theevaluationEvaluates ethicalissues in thestudy using thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates ethicalissues in thestudy using thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates ethicalissues in thestudy using 3/4of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates ethicalissues in thestudy using 3/4of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Does not addresssection orincludes less thanone-half of the Evaluates thepurposestatement usingthe componentsof the evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates thepurposestatement usingthe componentsof the evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates thepurposestatement using¾ of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates thepurposestatement usingone-half of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Does not addresssection orincludes less thanone-half of theevaluationEvaluates theliterature reviewusing thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates theliterature reviewusing thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates theliterature reviewusing ¾ of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Evaluates theliterature reviewusing one-half ofthe componentsof the evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018)Does not addresssection orincludes less thanone-half of theevaluation samplingstrategy usingthe componentsof the evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates thesamplingstrategy usingthe componentsof the evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates thesamplingstrategy using3/4 of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates thesamplingstrategy usingone-half of thecomponents ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).Does not addresssection orincludes less thanone-half of theevaluationEvaluates themeasurementstrategy andvalidity inquantitativestudies usingmost of theevaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).OREvaluatestrustworthinessof data inqualitativestudies usingmost of thechecklistcomponents inHouser (2018).Evaluates themeasurementstrategy andvalidity inquantitativestudies usingmost of theevaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).OREvaluatestrustworthinessof data inqualitativestudies usingmost of thechecklistcomponents inHouser (2018).Evaluates themeasurementstrategy inquantitativestudies using 3/4of the evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).OREvaluatestrustworthinessof data inqualitativestudies using 3/4of thecomponents ofthe checklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates themeasurementstrategy inquantitativestudies usingone-half of theevaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).OREvaluatestrustworthinessof data inqualitativestudies usingone-half of thecomponents ofthe checklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates themeasurementstrategy inquantitativestudies using onefourth or less ofthe evaluationchecklist inHouser (2018).OREvaluatestrustworthiness ofdata in qualitativestudies using onefourth or less ofthe components ofthe checklist inHouser (2018).Evaluates howstudy results may(or may not) beEvaluates howstudy results may(or may not) beDiscusses studyresults in generalbut not howDiscusses EBPin general butdoes not relate toDoes not discussresults or how