Prince George Community College Language in Cross Cultural Studies Discussion

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Prince George Community College Language in Cross Cultural Studies Discussion  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Please provide an aside or constructive feedback to the following two Topics. Do you agree with the analysis presented? Why? Do you have some additional thoughts on the topic? Share them. When providing your feedback present the logic behind it.

Topic 1

What are some cross-cultural implications that you would need to consider in the development of this questionnaire?

Building a universal survey can be difficult, especially when it is translated into other languages. There are various implications we would have to consider before we can proceed. I believe the first step would be to consider how the survey would be used. For example, will there be a numbered scale or a simple satisfaction scale? There are issues with most scales; for instance, if we used a numbered scale in countries like China and Germany, we would have to know on a scale measuring 1-5, 1 would be the best option (Puleston, 2021). In the United States, we often see scales measuring 1-5, with 5 being the top answer, so there is room for error with the numbered scale. I believe a satisfaction scale could be helpful, but it also has its downsides as words can become lost in translation. Some satisfaction scales include words that may have been interpreted differently in other cultures. To an American, the word “ok” can be interpreted as neutral or not great but not bad. In other countries like the United Kingdom or Australia, the word “ok” can be a favorable option on a survey (Puleston, 2021). Ideally, I would use a simple dichotomous scale, which is a scale with two diametrically opposed options, like yes or no (Birkett, 2019). The diametrically opposed options I would use are agreed or disagree. I like the agree and disagree option regarding answering survey questions surrounding depression and mood disorders; they offer a universal understanding for all languages. The only downside I think we would face is survey fatigue. There would undoubtedly be complex questions targeting specific issues that agree or disagree would not do justice. However, that is why the research on what questions to ask and how they are perceived in the various languages would be pivotal to the survey’s success.

References

Puleston, J. (2021, April 8). Considerations for conducting cross-cultural survey research. Kantar. Understand People. Inspire Growth. Retrieved November 30, 2021, from https://www.kantar.com/inspiration/research-services/considerations-for-conducting-cross-cultural-survey-research-pf.

Birkett, A. (2019, August 17). Survey response scales: How to choose the right one. CXL. Retrieved November 30, 2021, from https://cxl.com/blog/survey-response-scales/.

Topic 2

Cross-Cultural psychology I think was best defined and explained as the, “similarities and differences in individual psychological functioning in various cultural and ethnic groups; of the relationships between psychological variables and socio-cultural, ecological, and biological variables; and of current changes in these variables KAGITCIBASI, C. (2000)”. In respect to a questionnaire, the best approach culturally inclusive for scaling mood disorders, I’d think the first implication would be focused on social-economical Cultural differences. This will confine the inclusiveness, reliability, and validity of a questionnaire. For example, individualist and cultural variables are compared in a comprehensive experiment. Hagiwara, M. et al. (2020) conduct a study, that racked the cultural adaptation and administration of the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information Trends National Survey (HINTS) for a United States-dwelling Pacific Islander population in Hawai‘I”. Four focus groups comprised of “32 purposively-selected Micronesian migrants”, in which were utilized to develop a questionnaire that would be filtered to question factors extracted from the analytics. The key factors mesured were “the impact health practices, including religious and cancer fatalism, racism, health locus of control and other barriers (Cassel et al., 2020)”.