Saint Leo University Writing Maine v Thiboutot Case Discussion

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Saint Leo University Writing Maine v Thiboutot Case Discussion  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Vanessa

Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1, 100 S.Ct. 2502 (1980

The Main Department of Health services notified a married couple who total have eight children (three are from husbands previous marriage) that the three children that belonged to the husband would no longer make allowance for the money that is being spent to support the other five children. The husband was entitled to his under the Aid to Families with the Department Children Program of the Social Security Act. The husband is lawfully obligated to care and support all of the children. The couple decided the go to the Superior Court of Maine after draining all their administrative options to seek judicial review and to state a violation by the Commissioner of Human Resources by depriving the couple of welfare benefits and other families in similar situations who are eligible according to the Federal Social Security Act. When the Superior Courts reviewed the case they instructed the defendants from implementing the rules that are being challenged and instructed them to implement new regulations. They were also told to inform their class members and also pay the eligible class members and couples. The couple’s motion for attorney fees was denied by the courts. The ruling was the couples were qualified for attorney fees by the Civil Rights Attorneys Fees Awards Act. The courts allowed the Superior Court to use their desertion on the disposition of the fee request. 

I agree with the courts in trying to fix this because people rely on these aids to help with their families. People are entitled to money if they meet the requirements for the finical aid that is funded by the states. This is wrong for the states to revoke funds those who are eligible for the programs.

 respond to this persons discussion