CSCI 6532 IABFU Policy of Copyleft and Copyright License Essay
Description
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on CSCI 6532 IABFU Policy of Copyleft and Copyright License Essay completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
You will write a 550-word (EXCLUDING citations) essay that is opinion-based on the session’s topic ( I will put it down). Include your insights and cite 4 references supporting articles as needed.
You may also use a 1 or 2 pieces in the essay from my discussion post contribution.
THIS IS THE SESSION TOPIC Intellectual Property in the Real World and on the Internet. ( This coming week you will continue the slides and discussion on Intellectual Property by looking at the different copyright models now being proposed. Since Richard Stallman founded the Free Software Foundation in 1985 which resulted in Open Source software, many internet “radicals” have been pushing for open software and open copyrights. (check out https://www.fsf.org/ to find out more about the Free Software Foundation. Lessig founded the Creative Commons, which uses copyleft instead of copyright. Discuss pros and cons of copyleft vs copyright. How are real world copyright laws enforced on the Internet? Another interesting development in the copyright domain is the creation and trading of unique NFTs (non-fungible tokens) as a new online art form. You will want to look up NFTs and discuss whether or not they fit under a new type of copyright.
AND THIS IS MY DISCUSSION POST ABOUT IT:
Creative commons emerge to be an American non-profit organization and an international network that is typically devoted to the aspects to do with educational access and the expansion of the range of the creative works that emerge to be available for the other to build legally upon them also share. The organization came to life in 2001, and this was by one Lessig alongside other directors of the board. The organization was subsidized to help the writer of an article beat the issues related to upgrading inventiveness while tending to the world’s fiascos (Tambo et al., 2020). The firm has embraced the copyleft license, which awards others the position to adjust scholarly work uninhibitedly. Nonetheless, a few difficulties are confronted when a copyleft license is utilized compared to a copyright license.
Pros of copyleft vs. Copyright
Copyleft
Usually, a copyleft license is free of charge. If there is any consultation that is charged is usually less
With a copyleft license, there is usually a right to work with the parent software as per the needs of the consumer
The modifier may employ the derivate work without having to incur a high cost.
With a copyleft license, no middle-man is involved. The vendor pr cost fee is required to be paid.
Copyleft license usually promotes improvement and efficiency.
Copyright
When an organization or anybody builds up Copyright for their work, it applies immediately to whatever they distribute going forward.
Copyright laws were set up to secure those in the creative fields. The enactment informs those inside the inventive fields how to manage the break of Copyright in a civil setting.
Suppose one’s organization possesses a copyright on a particular work that is enlisted with the Copyright Office. In that case, they can demand a court order that orders the encroaching party to quit it immediately regarding distribution or execution of the referred work.
Cons of copyleft vs. Copyright
Copyleft
There might be additional costs of using the plugin models
It might not always incentivize labor
To control unfettered use and malice may pose an issue
Copyright
There is a registration process, and some fees applied
It is expensive for the owners to enforce
There is ambiguity.
It is usually hard to have copyright laws enforced on the internet. This is because, through the internet, one can access anything, and having such laws might hinder people from accessing some data and information.
References
Tambo, JA, Baraké, E., Kouevi, A., & Munthali, GT (2020). Copyright or copyleft: an assessment of farmer-innovators’ attitudes towards intellectual property rights. Journal of Rural Studies, 74 , 133-141.