St Thomas University Week 7 Adult Gerontology Acute Response
Description
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on St Thomas University Week 7 Adult Gerontology Acute Response completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Screening with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1
Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:
- Slide 1: Title Page.
- Slide 2: SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.
- Slide 3: Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.
- Slide 4: Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patients score and the interpretation of the patients score are required.
- Slide 5: Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your clients score and need for behavioral changes.
- Slide 6: Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.
- Slide 7: Evaluation of the process – Share the patients outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.
- Slide 8: References 5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.
Submission Instructions:
- The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
- The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.
- The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenters notes.
- Upload your PowerPoint without the narration for this assignment.
- Record the project with whatever software works best for you, upload it to Studio, and submit the project using Canvas Studio.
- Your initial post is worth 8 points.
- You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
- All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
- Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday in Module 4.
- Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
- You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
| NUR 650 SBIRT Rubric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Introduction |
5 to >3 pts Exemplary Introduced group established rapport, and explained the purpose of presentation in a creative, clear way capturing attention PRIOR to the presentation. 3 to >1 pts Proficient Started with a group introduction or Our topic is PRIOR to the presentation. Did not explain the purpose of the presentation. 1 to >0 pts Developing Did not introduce the group OR did not explain the purpose of the presentation. 0 pts Novice Did not clearly introduce the purpose of the presentation. Or nothing was submitted. |
/ 5 pts |
|
SBIRT Overview |
15 to >10 pts Exemplary Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 10 to >5 pts Proficient Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 5 to >1 pts Developing Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 1 to >0 pts Novice Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 0 pts Non-Performance Nothing was submitted. |
/ 15 pts |
|
Screening Tool |
20 to >14 pts Exemplary The screening tool used was discussed in detail. The tool used was highly specific and sensitive, based on current US evidence, to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were discussed in detail. 14 to >8 pts Proficient The screening tool used was mentioned. The tool was poorly specific and sensitive to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were mentioned. 8 to >2 pts Developing The screening tool used was mentioned. The tool used was not recommended for the population, ethnicity, age, and/or gender of the client. The raw score was mentioned but not interpreted. 2 to >0 pts Novice The screening tool used was mentioned. 0 pts Non-Performance Nothing was submitted. |
/ 20 pts |
|
Brief Intervention |
25 to >17 pts Exemplary Provides a summary of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change. 17 to >10 pts Proficient Provides a summary of 3 of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change. 10 to >3 pts Developing Provides a summary of two of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, OR roadblocks OR the client’s stage of change. 3 to >0 pts Novice The stages of the motivational interview were mentioned without detailed descriptions: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning. 0 pts Non-Performance Nothing was submitted. |
/ 25 pts |
|
Referral |
5 to >3 pts Exemplary Provides a detailed list of three or more referrals to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments. 3 to >2 pts Proficient Provides a detailed list of two referrals to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments. 2 to >0 pts Developing Provides a detailed list of one referral to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. A timeline for follow-up appointments is not provided. 0 pts Novice A referral was not provided during the session. Or nothing was submitted. |
/ 5 pts |
|
APA Formatting |
10 to >7 pts Exemplary References page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows 7th Edition APA guidelines of components e.g., double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations in 100% of the references. 7 to >4 pts Proficient References page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows 7th Edition APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations in up to 50% of the references. 4 to >0 pts Developing References page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Follows 7th Edition APA e.g., double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations in at least 25% of the references. 0 pts Novice References page does not include current, scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Does not follow 7th Edition APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. Or nothing was submitted. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Audio/Visual |
10 to >7 pts Exemplary Audio-Video presentation contains 10-15 slides. Followed APA best practices for PowerPoints, e.g., color, legibility. Well-rehearsed. Voice, eye contact and pacing hold the interest and attention of the audience. Within 30 seconds of the time allotted for the presentation. Slides are professional and easy to read. Content enables speakers to focus on the presentation and provide the audience with essential resources for later consideration. 7 to >4 pts Proficient Audio-Video presentation contains a minimum of 10 slides. Followed APA best practices for PowerPoints, e.g., color, legibility. Communicated ideas with proper voice projection; perhaps one mispronounced word; made eye contact 75% of the time and never read from notes. Less than one minute over or under the allotted time. 4 to >0 pts Developing Audio-Video presentation contains fewer than 10 slides, or some slides designed do not support the topic of the presentation. Followed APA best practices for PowerPoints, e.g., color, legibility. Poor voice projections; eye contact at least 25% of the time and appeared to read from notes; mispronounced > 10 words; long pauses. Presentation 1 minute over or under time allotted. 0 pts Novice Audio-Video presentation was not submitted or the video was not created using the audio or video platform required in the instructions. Great difficulty communicating ideas. Poor voice projection; no eye contact and read from notes >75% of the time; mispronounced words > 10 words;stopped or had long pauses. More than 2 minutes over or under the allotted time. Or nothing was submitted. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Conclusion |
5 to >3 pts Exemplary The presentation is concluded by tying the content back to the opening with a dynamic 25 words or less close. Transitioned into so the audience was ready for it. 3 to >0 pts Proficient Ends presentation with “goodbye or the end.” There was no transition to closure or summary of the presentation. 0 pts Novice Information is completely missing. Or nothing was submitted. |
/ 5 pts |
